Advertisement
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, April 10, 2007 - 12:53 PMShit, doesn't look too exciting. Hope it's good, the first one was. -
-
Unsu...
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, April 10, 2007 - 2:30 PMYeah...I kinda feel the same way.
I'm not a big fan of sequels.
Most of them have dissapointed me.
BUT there's always an exception! -
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Sun, April 29, 2007 - 6:00 PMstringer bell is in it!
the only reason i may go see it. (might go....might.) -
-
Unsu...
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, May 1, 2007 - 2:30 PMStringer!
I saw that !!
I'm a big fan of the Wire! -
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, May 1, 2007 - 5:21 PMi love the wire!
i can't wait for the 5th season (>_<)
-
-
-
-
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Thu, April 26, 2007 - 11:00 AMthey played a five minute clip during UFC last week. Doesn't look so bad. They kept the erie constant deep bass from the first one and I hear the director is no clown -
-
-
Unsu...
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Fri, April 27, 2007 - 10:45 PMI love the cinematography in the original.
I'm wondering if it will be similar in this film? -
-
Unsu...
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Fri, April 27, 2007 - 10:47 PM>> I'll go see it. How bad could it be?<<
Uh...did ya see The Hills Have Eyes 2
or Hellraiser Bloodline? ;-) -
-
Unsu...
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Sun, April 29, 2007 - 5:00 PMI know, after I made that comment I was thinking - well it COULD be pretty bad! hahaha but I'm trying to think positive since I loved the first one so much.
Most of the Hellraiser movies are kind of crappy but I like them anyway! Haven't seen THHE2 - didn't really care for the first one.
My gold standard for bad is House of the Dead. Nothing could be worse than that!
-
-
-
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, May 8, 2007 - 12:13 PMi also saw the little trailer on IFC.
i dunno...i always get freaked out by sequels. I think the original was pretty good. Was that the first occurance of "fast" zombies? -
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, June 5, 2007 - 11:13 AMi hate to be the one to beat this into the ground, but let's say it together, "THEY ARE NOT ZOMBIES" they are "infected with a rage virus"...i know that zombies are more common than "ragers", but it does help justify the fast moving and reactions. the thing it doesn't explain is why these "ragers" don't just attack each other...if it's mindless rampaging they're doing, wouldn't some of them end up ripping apart each other? just something that bothered me in the first movie...and the second...
speaking of the second, i loved that helicopter shot (i'm sure that anyone who's seen the movie knows what i'm talking about) and the burning of london, but the rest wasn't exactly the most compelling cinema. the plot was kind of silly, and it seems like the writers didn't know what to do with their ideas...it started out promisingly enough, but quickly degenerated...there are far too many extreme coincedences for me to keep my disbelief suspended. how did the dad get in the back door of the locked room of potential victims? how did he track down the kids after they escaped? **SPOILER: how did the copter make it all the way to france before the kids killed the pilot?**
the kids weren't really what i'd call good actors, but i have to say that the daughter definitely made me feel like a dirty old man...it was those BLUE eyes
btw, my first memory of "fast zombies" was in Return of the Living Dead...those zombies could also talk and set traps though, so they were obviously operating at a higher capacity than those in the original. ;) -
-
Oh my god I am an idiot... sorry Ian of this sounds pendantic and holier than thou. This is stupid silly zombie talk!!!!!
Thu, June 7, 2007 - 2:16 PMI do not want to be rude. I like you Ian. This has to be as tired a conversation as "Why did Chauncy Gardner walk on water at the end of Being There".
Outside of White Zombie, the first zombie film ever.... Night Of The Living Dead (NOTLD) is widely regarded as the hallmark first zombie film.
The very first zombie we EVER see in the history of cinema runs like a bat out of hell, so the very first zombie in the very first movie ran. This argument is over. "They're coming to get you barbara"... when that zombie gears up to go after her after wrestling with Jimmy
Go watch it now. I will wait. SEE? That big lug is running like a fucking freight train after Barbara.
ALSO.... about "zombies"
1) Matheson's "I am Legend" vampires were... for all intensive purposes... zombies. It's metaphor. That was probably the advent of zombies. Someone can counter... but Matheson invented zombies by using a archetypical vessel (existing vampires) and redefining them.
2) the 28 days later zombies are not zombies, but allegorically, metaphorically.... they are zombies. Without a shadow of a fucking doubt.
3) Zombies are
a) about the impending onslaught. not that one will kill you... but that they will all, eventually, overrun you... and you will become one of
them.
b) It is ALWAYS more about the living people, than the backdrop of a zombie apocalypse. It is about the heirarchy.. the social norms
twisted..... like in NOTLD.... a black man telling white people what to do. In 1967... that was unheard of. I think it was made in 67,
released in 68.
Zombies are a metaphor. They are a social commentary at the inevitability of capitalism or consumerism eating you. It is about the mindless consumption of our society.... "Hey neighbor, I have a bigger garage"
"Oh yeah, look at my new lawnmower"
"Oh yeah, well I am going to buy that too"
Eventually everyone is just eating each other.
But they are a meme... or a tool to metaphorically direct the viewers, and the protagonists, that the culture they are living in will eventually consume them. One zombie is NOT scary. That, in fact might be fun.
But endless hordes of moaning undead? You can't escape it.....
and that is the point... whether zombies are a metaphor for Bush's administration destroying the planet, or about mindless consumerism and war mongering.... or about a changing society redefining race and gender roles in a new age (NOTLD's commentary on race and gender hierarchy....)..
so however the metaphor comes, it is still loaded with its original intent. Doesn't matter if they are technically zombies or not.
Cept when Uwe Boll gets a hold of them. The gun toting karate kicking zombie must die.
Well they all must die. So at least maybe Uwe Boll should die. -
-
Re: Oh my god I am an idiot... sorry Ian of this sounds pendantic and holier than thou. This is stupid silly zombie talk!!!!!
Thu, June 7, 2007 - 2:31 PMI just reread this.
And I get uppity about my dorky Star Wars fanboy friends.
I am a 30 year old man talking zombies. Proud of it. Self aware of total dorkness... but self aware.
Self awareness is everything.
-
-
-
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Tue, May 8, 2007 - 4:26 PMit opens at the Bridge (the theatre on Geary by Lake (4 blocks down from Masonic) on Friday.
If you go see it, go see it there!! If you've never been there, it's a great theatre!
I'm probably going to end up seeing it.. -
-
-
-
-
Re: 28 Weeks Later
Sun, September 16, 2007 - 2:52 PMwhen i watched the first one it was good up until the armymen got involved. go figure? then the plot turned for the worst. after watching the first one suck so bad, i just can't put myself threw it again.
-
